Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | padreterno | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Esper Pixie | taltheturtle | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Esper Pixie | yulo | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Esper Pixie | raizeer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Esper Pixie | mortadela | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Mono Black Aggro , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab ranks #305 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 90%).
Black average: 60.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 4.64 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 67.8%. Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab has a win rate of 65.4%, making it 3.5% worse than other 5-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scrollshift | Instant | 11 | 72.5% | 3 |
Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 36 | 67.6% | 8 |
Bottomless Pool/Locker Room | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 7 | 65.9% | 2 |
Split Up | Sorcery | 14 | 62.2% | 5 |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 69 | 58.5% | 15 |
Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 10 | 57.7% | 1 |
Stock Up | Sorcery | 61 | 57.1% | 14 |
Duress | Sorcery | 76 | 56.7% | 17 |
Tithing Blade | Artifact // Artifact | 225 | 56.0% | 43 |
Shrouded Shepherd | Creature — Spirit Warrior // Sorcery — Adventure | 161 | 55.8% | 32 |
Cards that perform better with Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 5 | 88.5% | 66.3% | +22.1% |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 5 | 78.6% | 66.9% | +11.7% |
Entity Tracker | Creature — Human Scout | 3 | 17 | 70.9% | 67.6% | +3.3% |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 27 | 70.5% | 67.2% | +3.2% |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 23 | 69.4% | 67.7% | +1.7% |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 29 | 65.9% | 64.8% | +1.1% |
Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 55 | 66.6% | 65.8% | +0.8% |
No More Lies | Instant | 2 | 37 | 67.2% | 66.5% | +0.7% |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 35 | 67.6% | 67.2% | +0.4% |
Pest Control | Sorcery | 2 | 22 | 66.1% | 65.8% | +0.4% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 894 | 57.8% | 52.0% |
Dimir Midrange | 18 | 0.9% | 54.1% |
Dimir Bounce | 14 | 2.9% | 44.2% |
2 | 4.3% | 58.3% | |
Unclassified | 2 | 1.0% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.